[Case Brief] Central Bank of India v/s State of AP & Others, 2005

Brief Facts and Procedural History: The petitioner, Central Bank of India, is a nationalized bank. According to the petitioner, M/s. Kirlampudi Sugar Mills Limited (KSML), the fifth respondent, availed cash credit limit and term loans from one of the branches of the petitioner bank. To secure the loan, KSML had hypothecated the plant and machinery […]

[Case Brief] Yahoo!,Inc. v/s Akash Arora and Another, 1999

Brief Facts and Procedural History- In the present case, a decree of permanent injunction is sought against the defendants (Akash Arora), their partners, servants, agents from operating any business and/or selling, offering for sale, advertising and in any manner dealing in any services or goods on the Internet or otherwise under the trademark or domain […]

[Case Brief] Tata Sons Ltd. and Another v/s Arno Palmen and Another, 2013

Brief Facts and Procedural history- The present suit is instituted by Tata Sons Ltd. (Plaintiffs No 1) and Tata Info-tech Ltd.  (Plaintiff No. 2) in order to seek permanent injunction against the defendants from using the trademark/domain name www.tatainfotech.in or any other mark/domain name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trademark […]

[Case Brief] Sharad Kumar v/s Government of NCT of Delhi & Others, 2002

Brief Facts and Procedural History- Sharad Kumar was serving the post of ‘Area Sales Executive’ in the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. By an order dated 20.12.1995, his service was terminated without any kind of show-cause notice or inquiry. However, salary for one month was sent to him along with the termination letter. […]