ASI to Submit Survey Report to Supreme Court on Religious Structures in Mehrauli Archaeological Park

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) is reportedly set to submit a survey report to the Supreme Court concerning religious structures located within the Mehrauli Archaeological Park, a historically significant area in Delhi. The report likely focuses on detailing the presence, condition, and historical significance of these structures, as well as any encroachments or disputes related to the land.

This comes against the backdrop of legal proceedings or concerns surrounding the preservation and use of the land in the park, which houses numerous monuments and sites of archaeological importance, spanning from the Delhi Sultanate to Mughal periods. The Supreme Court’s involvement suggests that the matter may have significant implications, such as determining the rightful usage of these structures or addressing communal or cultural sensitivities.

he Mehrauli Archaeological Park is a historically rich site spread over 200 acres near the Qutub Minar in Delhi. It’s a unique area containing layers of history, with over 100 heritage structures from the Khalji, Tughlaq, Lodhi, Mughal, and British periods. Some notable landmarks include the Tomb of Balban, the Jamali Kamali Mosque and Tomb, the Rajon Ki Baoli (stepwell), and the Metcalfe’s House. The park is also dotted with remnants of earlier settlements and religious structures, including mosques and temples.

Possible Context of the Dispute:

1. Encroachment Issues:
   • Over time, portions of the Mehrauli Archaeological Park have been encroached upon by private constructions, religious establishments, and illegal settlements. This often leads to disputes over rightful ownership or usage of the land.
2. Religious Structures in the Park:
   • The presence of religious structures, including mosques and temples, within the park adds complexity to preservation efforts. Such structures might have historical as well as ongoing religious significance, leading to sensitivities in any government action.
3. Survey Purpose:
   • The Supreme Court likely directed the ASI to conduct the survey to determine:
     • The historical value of the religious structures.
     • Whether these structures are legally protected under heritage laws.
     • Any encroachment or unauthorized construction.
   • The findings will help the court make informed decisions about land use, preservation, and potential restoration efforts.
4. Legal and Cultural Implications:
   • The issue touches on the delicate balance between protecting India’s heritage and respecting the contemporary religious practices linked to such spaces.
   • The Supreme Court’s involvement suggests the matter might have broader ramifications for similar heritage-religion intersections across the country.

Broader Concerns:

• Preservation vs. Accessibility: Ensuring the preservation of heritage structures while allowing public and religious use.
• Tourism and Urbanization: Balancing the park’s use as a tourist destination and protecting it from urban pressures.
• Historical Documentation: Properly documenting and conserving structures that could otherwise be lost due to neglect.